...many ECFs show how Peter is more representative of the church and
the true Rock is Christ, the Son of the Living God.
+++
Augustine († 430), the greatest
theological authority of the Latin church, at first referred the words,
“On this rock I will build my church,” to the person of Peter, but
afterward expressly retracted this interpretation, and considered the
petra to be Christ, on the ground of a distinction between petra (ἐπὶ
ταύτῃ τῇ πέτρᾳ) and Petrus (σὺ εἷ Πέτρος); a distinction which Jerome
also makes, though with the intimation that it is not properly
applicable to the Hebrew and Syriac Cephas.565 “I have somewhere said of
St. Peter” thus Augustine corrects himself in
his Retractations at the close of his life566—“that the church is built
upon him as the rock; a thought which is sung by many in the verses of
St. Ambrose:
’Hoc ipsa petra ecclesiae
Canente, culpam diluit.’567
Canente, culpam diluit.’567
(The Rock of the church himself In the cock-crowing atones his guilt.)
But I know that I have since frequently said, that the word
of the Lord, ’Thou art Petrus, and on this petra I will build my
church,’ must be understood of him, whom Peter confessed as Son of the
living God; and Peter, so named after this rock, represents the person
of the church, which is founded on this rock and has received the keys
of the kingdom of heaven. For it was not said to him: ’Thou art a rock’
(petra), but, ’Thou art Peter’ (Petrus); and the rock was Christ,
through confession of whom Simon received the name of Peter. Yet the
reader may decide which of the two interpretations is the more
probable.” In the same strain he says, in another place: “Peter, in
virtue of the primacy of his apostolate, stands, by a figurative
generalization, for the church .... When it was said to him, ’I will
give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven,’ &c., he
represented the whole church, which in this world is assailed by various
temptations, as if by floods and storms, yet does not fall, because it
is founded upon a rock, from which Peter received his name. For the rock
is not so named from Peter, but Peter from the rock (non enim a Petro
petra, sed Petrus a petra), even as Christ is not so called after the
Christian, but the Christian after Christ. For the reason why the Lord
says, ’On this rock I will build my church’ is that Peter had said:
’Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God,’ On this rock, which
then hast confessed, says he will build my church. For Christ was the
rock (petra enim erat Christus), upon which also Peter himself was
built; for other foundation can no man lay, than that is laid, which is
Jesus Christ. Thus the church, which is built upon Christ, has received
from him, in the person of Peter, the keys of heaven; that is, the power
of binding and loosing sins.”568 This Augustinian
interpretation of the petra has since been revived by some Protestant
theologians in the cause of anti-Romanism.569Augustine, it is true,
unquestionably understood by the church the visible Catholic church,
descended from the apostles, especially from Peter, through the
succession of bishops; and according to the usage of his time he called
the Roman church by eminence the sedes apostolica.570 But on the other
hand, like Cyprian and Jerome, he lays stress upon the essential unity
of the episcopate, and insists that the keys of the kingdom of heaven
were committed not to a single man, but to the whole church, which Peter
was only set to represent.571 With this view agrees the independent
position of the North African church in the time of Augustine
toward Rome, as we have already observed it in the case of the appeal
of Apiarius, and as it appears in the Pelagian controversy, of which Augustine
was the leader. This father, therefore, can at all events be cited only
as a witness to the limited authority of the Roman chair. And it should
also, in justice, be observed, that in his numerous writings he very
rarely speaks of that authority at all, and then for the most part
incidentally; showing that he attached far less importance to this
matter than the Roman divines
No comments:
Post a Comment